- Investigation finds that Shell failed to comply with consents
- NSTA committed to maintaining stable regulatory regime
The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) has fined Shell UK Limited £50,000 and served it with a Sanction Notice for breaching five field production consents.
Effective management of production consents is an indicator of good stewardship of fields, and is an important component of a stable, well-regulated industry which has the trust and confidence of investors and the public.
The NSTA raised concerns with Shell in November 2020 that the company had failed to comply with the maximum and minimum volumes specified in the production consents for five Southern North Sea fields in 2020. An NSTA investigation confirmed the failure.
Shell’s own internal review found that it did not fully implement a new procedure to improve compliance with production consents because it failed to conduct an effective handover following a restructuring exercise.
But for the NSTA bringing these matters to Shell’s attention, the failure to monitor production more closely may not have come to light and the company would have remained in breach of regulatory commitments for longer.
Following discussions with the NSTA and having completed its own internal report into the failings, Shell has engaged more proactively with the NSTA. The company is implementing the recommendations of its internal review and is committed to improving compliance.
The NSTA has repeatedly signalled to the UK oil and gas industry that compliance with regulatory obligations is vital to sustaining the sector’s social licence to operate and retaining the confidence of investors.
This investigation was the fourth probe into compliance matters opened by the NSTA in 2021 and followed the publication in October 2020 of our Thematic Review into Industry Compliance with Regulatory Obligations.
The review, which examined compliance in six areas of interaction between the NSTA and licensees, identified some very good, and improving, practice, but also noted the need for further improvement and warned that sanctions could follow in cases where breaches were found.
Tom Wheeler, NSTA Director of Regulation, said: “In this instance, Shell did not live up to its commitments and responsibilities, in a way that could detract from industry’s social licence to operate.
“However, Shell did cooperate fully with the NSTA’s investigation and is already implementing the recommendations from its internal review, dealing with the immediate causes of the failure to comply with production consents.
“The NSTA is committed to maintaining a stable and predictable system of regulation which encourages investment in relevant activities and is working with industry to ensure that compliance continues to improve.”
Notes to editors:
Production consents define a range that production levels should lie within. The top of the range is consistent with that allowed by a relevant environmental statement or direction. The bottom of the range is intended to ensure that licensees either take action to bring forward further activity in a field or decommission the field in a timely manner.
For more information contact:
Tel: 07776 548196